Querin Law

Phil Querin Q&A: Tenants Rent Tenders After Eviction Filed

Question: Landlord sent a 10-day nonpayment of rent notice to a resident.  The night before filing the FED the landlord called the resident to remind them to pay - hoping to resolve it before filing and paying the filing fee.  Landlord did not hear back from the resident, so he filed the FED and paid the filing fee of $143.00.  Several days later the resident shows up at the park office and offers to pay the rent.  Landlord refused to accept the rent tender since the resident would not also pay the filing fee.  Can the landlord decline the rent tender after filing the FED if the resident refuses to pay the filing fee? What happens in court?

 

Phil Querin: 55 and Older Communities

The following article is a discussion of the federal Fair Housing law governing 55+ communities.  The contents are not intended to constitute legal advice, and should not be relied upon by the reader as such.  All legal questions regarding this complicated and important law should be directed to legal counsel familiar with the area.

 

The Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA) went into effect on March 12, 1989.  That Act amended Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin in the sale, rental, or financing of residential housing.  The FHAA added two additional protected classes; (1) persons with disabilities and (2) families with children.  Children include persons under the age of 18 years.

 

Phil Querin Article : Tips for Preparing Bulletproof Notices

 

Always Assume The Matter Will Go To Court

 

While most legal notices will have their desired effect – e.g. the tenant will pay the rent, or maintain the space, or do what is necessary to comply – there are a small number of tenants who will fight. Of those who fight, some will secure an attorney. Most attorneys know that the easiest way to win is to attack the notice for some deficiency. If the notice is legally insufficient, the landlord’s case will fail without any examination of the merits of the case. The failure to win in court oftentimes leaves management with an unmanageable tenant.

 

Accordingly, when landlords and managers prepare notices, they should always assume that the notice will be contested. This approach is the best protection landlords have in securing compliance in those cases where the tenant decides to fight.

 

What does it mean to draft a notice as if the matter will go to court? It means that someone – the judge or jury - will be scrutinizing the document. It means making sure that everything is filled out correctly before mailing or delivering it. It means using a form, if one is available, rather than hand-drafting a notice. It means making sure that the proper form is used. In some circumstances, it may mean having your attorney review the form before sending it out.

 

 

Phil Querin Q&A: Bad Tenant Applies for Temporary Occupant

Question:  A former tenant who signed over his mobile but left the Park with almost $8,000 in back rent, unpaid property taxes and attorney fees is now applying to be a Temporary Occupant in a neighbor’s home.  Is there any way I can prevent him from living in the Park? If I deny him temporary occupancy, I’m afraid he will say he will be serving as a care giver for the current tenant.  What can I do?

 

Phil Querin Article: Terminations for Cause (Continuing vs. Distinct Violations)(MHCO Forms 43 & 43A)

 

 

The Basics. Except where the physical condition of the home is at issue, a landlord may terminate the space rental agreement by giving the tenant not less than 30 days’ notice in writing if the tenant:

  1. Materially violates a law related to the tenant’s conduct as a tenant;
  2. Materially violates a rental agreement[1] provision related to the tenant’s conduct as a tenant and imposed as a condition of occupancy; or
  3. Is classified as a level three sex offender under ORS 163A.100.

 

Phil Querin Q&A: Child Care Facilities in Oregon Manufactured Housing Parks

 

Question:   Oregon passed a law last year that prohibits housing providers from implementing community rules prohibiting residents from having daycare facilities in their homes.  Among other things, the law states that housing providers can require residents with these facilities in their homes to provide proof of insurance.  However, I’m unclear as to what type of insurance and how much we should be requiring.  At our park there are two residents offering daycare services in their homes and we’d like to follow-up and require liability insurance.  What type of insurance should we require of them and in what amounts?  Is there anything more we ought to be doing in response to this change in Oregon law?  Thanks. 

 

 

Subscribe to Querin Law