MHCO Article Topics
Answer: For purpose of addressing this issue, I will assume that the community currently includes the operating costs for the well in the base rent, i.e. it is not a charge to residents outside of base rent that is allocated to them on a prorata (i.e. per space) basis. Well water is not something you may separately charge the residents for under ORS 90.532.
Answer. First, one caveat: This Answer is not intended to constitute legal advice. It is educational only, and should not be relied upon by an MHCO member in lieu of consulting their own legal counsel, who is familiar with their own specific factual situation. Let’s start with a definition of a “utility” under Oregon’s Residential Landlord Tenant Act.
Answer. It is unclear if there ever was an actual agreement between landlord and tenant that the overpayments were to be applied toward late fees. For purposes of this question, I will assume there was an understanding of sorts [what tenant intentionally overpays, without a reason?], but presumably not in writing; hence, this dispute.
Answer: Be aware that utility charges, late fees, etc. are not “rent.” Rent is the charge for the resident’s right to remain at the space. As you know from the MHCO 72-hour Notice, the right to evict only arises when the rent remains unpaid for seven days following the date of payment, which is usually the first of the month.
Answer: The answer is found in ORS 90.302 (Fees allowed for certain landlord expenses). What follows is a brief summary: (1) A landlord may not charge a fee at the beginning of the tenancy for an anticipated expense (i.e. one that has not actually occurred). (2) A landlord may not require the payment of any fee except as provided in this statute.
The 2011 Oregon Legislative Session has now reached the halfway point. MHCO has been successful in defeating a number of particularly bad pieces of legislation. We need to stay engaged and vigiliant as the Legislative Session moves to adjournment in late June.
MHCO Defeated:
Answer: The Oregon landlord-tenant law does not “require” that a landlord accept partial payments. To the contrary, it provides that it is a “tenant’s duty regarding rent payments is to tender to the landlord an offer of the full amount of rent owed within the time allowed by law and by the rental agreement….”
Question: A home was purchased by a local dealer from a resident who had not paid rent for several months. The dealer then sold the home to another person who applied for tenancy and passed the screening criteria. The landlord wants the past due rent ($900) paid before permitting applicant to move into the home. Can the landlord go after the dealer to pay the past due rent?